"....semua makhluk ciptaan Tuhan samada manusia,binatang,tumbuhan, alam semulajadi dan sebagainya,saling perlu memerlukan,saling bantu-membantu kerana mereka berkait,terikat antara satu sama lain dalam satu kitaran yang berhubungan. Justeru, jangan diputuskan ikatan itu, kelak, seluruh kitaran akan musnah..." Ahmad Rais Johari
Friday, March 16, 2012
About Unit Kerjasama Awam dan Swasta (UKAS) Prime Minister Office.
Majlis Berbuka Puasa Sunat (Isnin & Khamis) di Masjid Al-Wathiqubillah Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin, UiTM Shah Alam.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Persaingan Vs. Kerjasama - Mana Lebih Utama?
The Magic of Doing One Thing at a Time
Why is it that between 25 and 50 per cent of people report feeling overwhelmed or burned out at work?
It's not just the number of hours we're working, but also the fact that we spend too many continuous hours juggling too many things at the same time.
What we've lost, above all, are stopping points, finish lines and boundaries. Technology has blurred them beyond recognition. Wherever we go, our work follows us, on our digital devices, ever insistent and intrusive. It's like an itch we can't resist scratching, even though scratching invariably makes it worse.
Tell the truth: Do you answer email during conference calls (and sometimes even during calls with one other person)? Do you bring your laptop to meetings and then pretend you're taking notes while you surf the net? Do you eat lunch at your desk? Do you make calls while you're driving, and even send the occasional text, even though you know you shouldn't?
The biggest cost — assuming you don't crash — is to your productivity. In part, that's a simple consequence of splitting your attention, so that you're partially engaged in multiple activities but rarely fully engaged in any one. In part, it's because when you switch away from a primary task to do something else, you're increasing the time it takes to finish that task by an average of 25 per cent.
But most insidiously, it's because if you're always doing something, you're relentlessly burning down your available reservoir of energy over the course of every day, so you have less available with every passing hour.
I know this from my own experience. I get two to three times as much writing accomplished when I focus without interruption for a designated period of time and then take a real break, away from my desk. The best way for an organization to fuel higher productivity and more innovative thinking is to strongly encourage finite periods of absorbed focus, as well as shorter periods of real renewal.
If you're a manager, here are three policies worth promoting:
1. Maintain meeting discipline. Schedule meetings for 45 minutes, rather than an hour or longer, so participants can stay focused, take time afterward to reflect on what's been discussed, and recover before the next obligation. Start all meetings at a precise time, end at a precise time, and insist that all digital devices be turned off throughout the meeting.
2. Stop demanding or expecting instant responsiveness at every moment of the day. It forces your people into reactive mode, fractures their attention, and makes it difficult for them to sustain attention on their priorities. Let them turn off their email at certain times. If it's urgent, you can call them — but that won't happen very often.
3. Encourage renewal. Create at least one time during the day when you encourage your people to stop working and take a break. Offer a midafternoon class in yoga, or meditation, organize a group walk or workout, or consider creating a renewal room where people can relax, or take a nap.
It's also up to individuals to set their own boundaries. Consider these three behaviors for yourself:
1. Do the most important thing first in the morning, preferably without interruption, for 60 to 90 minutes, with a clear start and stop time. If possible, work in a private space during this period, or with sound-reducing earphones. Finally, resist every impulse to distraction, knowing that you have a designated stopping point. The more absorbed you can get, the more productive you'll be. When you're done, take at least a few minutes to renew.
2. Establish regular, scheduled times to think more long term, creatively, or strategically. If you don't, you'll constantly succumb to the tyranny of the urgent. Also, find a different environment in which to do this activity — preferably one that's relaxed and conducive to open-ended thinking.
3. Take real and regular vacations. Real means that when you're off, you're truly disconnecting from work. Regular means several times a year if possible, even if some are only two or three days added to a weekend. The research strongly suggests that you'll be far healthier if you take all of your vacation time, and more productive overall.
A single principle lies at the heart of all these suggestions. When you're engaged at work, fully engage, for defined periods of time. When you're renewing, truly renew. Make waves. Stop living your life in the gray zone.
by

TONY SCHWARTZ
Tony Schwartz is the president and CEO of The Energy Project and the author of Be Excellent at Anything. Become a fan of The Energy Project on Facebook and connect with Tony at Twitter.com/TonySchwartz and Twitter.com/Energy_Project.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Berkerja Kerana Allah S.W.T - Sr. Tuan Hj. Tamzil Munir
Bill Gates Was Speechless When A Microsoft Manager Compared Windows To A Toilet
Today, Cooperman described a meeting in 2003, when he tried to convince Bill Gates that different software features could have different types of designs.
As an engineer, Gates had a firm belief that interface design should be as consistent as possible -- why rewrite menus in a bunch of different ways? It was a waste of time and code.
Cooperman believed that people aren't that robotic and can handle variations. It's more important to make sure the overall user experience feels good.
So he told Gates, "A shower, a toilet, and a water fountain all have mechanisms to control water flow, places where the water comes out, some sort of porcelain basin to hold the water, and a drain, but we don’t combine them into one thing to reduce their learning curve."
Gates paused for what seemed like forever.
Then he finally came out with, "That's just rude."
Cooperman lost the battle, but Microsoft has since come around to the idea that user experience can be tailored for different functions -- just look at the way Windows 8 combines two totally different interfaces in the same product.
Full credit to Cooperman for bringing Bill Gates to a near speechless state. In his earlier days, Gates was known for his blunt opinions, including favorites like "that's the stupidest f-ing idea I've ever heard."
Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.
(Sources - http://www.businessinsider.com)
A Patent Lie: How Yahoo Weaponized My Work
While most of the tech world was partying at South by Southwest in Austin yesterday, Yahoo announced it was filing a lawsuit against Facebook for allegedly infringing on 10 patents from their 1,000+ patent warehouse.
I’m no fan of Facebook, but this is a deplorable move. It’s nothing less than extortion, expertly timed during the SEC-mandated quiet period before Facebook’s IPO. It’s an attack on invention and the hacker ethic.
In the interest of full disclosure, I have a small supporting role in this story. None of the patents I co-invented are cited in the Yahoo complaint, but a handful of applications I worked on with Yahoo were granted patents, weaponized now to use against people like me.
Here’s how the process worked, in my case:
In 2005, Yahoo acquired Upcoming.org, the collaborative events calendar I’d launched two years before.
Back then, the Web 1.0 behemoth seemed on the verge of turning things around. A series of smart moves — high-profile hires, the Oddpost and Flickr acquisitions, the launch of the Yahoo! Developer Network, and their Research Lab — was breathing new life into things. Two months after we were acquired, Del.icio.us and Webjay joined us in the Yahoo fold.
After we moved in, we were asked to file patents for anything and everything we’d invented while working on Upcoming.org. Every Yahoo employee was encouraged to participate in their “Patent Incentive Program,” with sizable bonuses issued to everyone who took the time to apply.
Now, I’ve always hated the idea of software patents. But Yahoo assured us that their patent portfolio was a precautionary measure, to defend against patent trolls and others who might try to attack Yahoo with their own holdings. It was a cold war, stockpiling patents instead of nuclear arms, and every company in the valley had a bunker full of them.
Against my better judgement, I sat in a conference room with my co-founders and a couple of patent attorneys and told them what we’d created. They took notes and created nonsensical documents that I still can’t make sense of. In all, I helped Yahoo file eight patent applications.
Years after I left I discovered to my dismay that four of them were granted by the U.S. Patent and Trade Office.
I thought I was giving them a shield, but turns out I gave them a missile with my name permanently engraved on it.
I was naive. Even if the original intention was truly defensive, a patent portfolio can easily change hands, and a company can even more easily change its mind. Since I left in 2007, Yahoo has had three CEOsand a board overhaul.
The scary part is that even the most innocuous patent can be used to crush another’s creativity. One of the patents I co-invented is so abstract, it could not only cover Facebook’s News Feed, but virtually any activity feed. It puts into very sharp focus the trouble with software patents: Purposefully vague wording invites broad interpretation.
In their complaint, Yahoo alleges that Facebook’s News Feed violates “Dynamic page generator,” apatent filed in 1997 by their former CTO related to the launch of My Yahoo, one of the first personalized websites. Every web application, from Twitter to Pinterest, could be said to violate this patent. This is chaos.
Software patents should be abolished, plain and simple. Software is already covered by copyright, making patent protection unnecessary.
Ask any programmer — developing software is as creative and unique as writing poetry.
Yahoo’s lawsuit against Facebook is an insult to the talented engineers who filed patents with the understanding they wouldn’t be used for evil. Betraying that trust won’t be forgotten, but I doubt it matters anymore. Nobody I know wants to work for a company like that.
I’m embarrassed by the patents I filed, but I’ve learned from my mistake. I’ll never file a software patent again, and I urge you to do the same.
For years, Yahoo was mostly harmless. Management foibles and executive shuffles only hurt shareholders and employee morale. But in the last few years, the company’s incompetence has begun to hurt the rest of us. First, with the wholesale destruction of internet history, and now by attacking younger, smarter companies.
Yahoo tried and failed, over and over again, to build a social network that people would love and use. Unable to innovate, Yahoo is falling back to the last resort of a desperate, dying company: litigation as a business model.
That it’s Yahoo makes it even sadder. The complaint isn’t really wrong when it asserts that: “For much of the technology upon which Facebook is based, Yahoo! got there first.”
But being first with something generic that would have been invented by someone (like the wheel) — as opposed to something few could have imagined (like the Segway) — is a big difference.
Ask any start-up CEO — execution is everything.
As Facebook founder Jesse Eisenberg cum Mark Zuckerberg says in The Social Network, “If you guys were the inventors of Facebook, you’d have invented Facebook.”
Illustration: From one of the patents I helped Yahoo obtain.
Homepage photo: Schill/Flickr
Andy Baio is a writer and tech entrepreneur in Portland, OR. He blogs at Waxy.org, and writes the Wired column "Codeword" every Tuesday. He works with Expert Labs, helped build Kickstarter, founded Upcoming, made the album Kind of Bloop, and other stuff too.
Follow @waxpancake on Twitter.
(Sources - http://www.wired.com)
As Dell Shifts To Software & Services, Announces Plans To Buy SonicWall
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Government Has No Plans To Introduce Freedom Of Information Act - Rais
(Bernama) -- The Information, Communications and Culture Ministry has no plans to formulate a Freedom of Information Act because this is already provided for by the Constitution. Its minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim said matters like freedom of speech, basic freedoms, Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, audit reports, Information Act 1950, were provided for by the Constitution, "As such, my ministry is only focusing on information dissemination using the new media like the Internet as a platfrom to channel and share information with the people by raising the capability of the communications network rather than introducing a new act," he said during question time in the Dewan Rakyat today.
Rais said this in replying to a question from Khairy Jamaluddin (BN-Rembau) who had wanted to know if the government had plans to introduce such an act to encourage provision of information from public and private sector bodies.To another question from Khairy on abolishing the Official Secrets Act 1972, Rais said the government saw the act as necessary for national interest.
Yahoo saman Facebook
2012/03/13,
Monday, March 12, 2012
Cerita Al Amir Shakib Arsalan Mengenai Budaya Mengampu
Network Communication Speed Comparison Chart
As the demand for faster speeds has grown rapidly over recent decades, new communications networking equipment and systems are constantly being developed to accommodate these requirements . A result of these efforts is a series of established networking protocols and terminology that are used to identify various speed thresholds and the related equipment.
The chart below is intended as a quick reference guide to help readers associate the various networking speeds with their respective protocol/service names.
Network Communication Speed Comparison Chart
Max Throughput Speed | Protocol / Service |
64 kbps | DSO / Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) |
1.5 Mbps | DS1 / T1 |
10 Mbps | 10Base-T Ethernet / RS-422 |
45 Mbps | DS3 / T3 |
100 Mbps | 100Base-T Ethernet (Fast Ethernet) / FDDI |
155 Mbps | OC-3 / STM-1 Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) / Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) |
200 Mbps | ESCON (Enterprise Systems Connectivity) |
622 Mbps | OC-12 / STM-4 |
1 Gbps | Gigabit Ethernet and Fibre Channel |
2 Gbps | Fibre Channel |
2.5 Gbps | OC-48 / STM-16 / OTU1 (Optical Transport Unit) |
4/8 Gbps | Fibre Channel / Infiniband |
10 Gbps | 10G Ethernet / OC-192 / STM-64 / OTU2 / Fibre Channel (Serial and Parallel) |
16 Gbps | Fibre Channel / Infiniband |
40/43 Gbps | OC-768 / OTU3 |
100/112 Gbps | 100GE / OTU4 |
Various | Video and proprietary protocols |
> 1 Tbps | Wavelength Division Multiplex |
Chart courtesy of ONPATH Technologies
Whitepaper “Optical Switching: Implementing a Future-Proof Infrastructure”
